Neogenomics

NEO · NASDAQ

$16.62+$0.20 (+1.22%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $16.42

NEO analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 7 analysts over the last 12 months. 100% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy7
  • Hold0
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 10 analysts

Average $20.12 (+21.0% upside)

Low
$16.16
Now
$16.62
High
$36.75

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

NEO analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
StoneXOct 6, 2026MaintainsBuy
NeedhamOct 6, 2026MaintainsBuy
BTIGOct 6, 2026UpgradeNeutral → Buy
NeedhamJul 29, 2026MaintainsBuy
BenchmarkJul 24, 2026MaintainsBuy
BenchmarkApr 29, 2026UpgradeHold → Buy
TD CowenApr 29, 2026MaintainsBuy
Leerink PartnersApr 29, 2026UpgradeMarket Perform → Outperform
Piper SandlerFeb 24, 2026MaintainsOverweight
NeedhamFeb 17, 2026MaintainsBuy

The case for and against

Updated Oct 18, 2026

Bull case

NeoGenomics is viewed favorably because its operating turnaround appears real, with four consecutive quarterly top-line beats, five straight quarters of double-digit growth, and Q2’26 revenue of $202M with clinical revenue up 14% year over year, supported by improving gross margins and a 12% increase in revenue per test to $515. The company’s core growth drivers are strengthening as NGS mix expanded 26% year over year, reimbursement for PanTracer LBx was secured in March 2026, and RaDaR ST received CMS coverage in August 2026 for immunotherapy monitoring, which should expand case volume and recurring MRD demand. Fundamentally, the stock still screens cheaply at roughly 3x 2027 consensus revenue versus about 11x for peers, while management expects 2026 revenue of $802M-$806M and adjusted EBITDA of $56M-$58M, leaving room for multiple re-rating as execution and reimbursement improve.

Bear case

NeoGenomics is facing a structurally difficult competitive backdrop, as it may not keep pace with larger specialty labs on test innovation or aggressive commercial tactics, leaving it vulnerable to market share loss to more focused competitors. Its fundamentals are also pressured by unpredictable reimbursement from CMS and private payers, plus a heavily regulated U.S. and international operating environment where CLIA, state, and billing changes can quickly raise costs or reduce revenue. The bear case assumes revenue growth of 7% or less, driven by slower test-menu expansion, weaker reimbursement, and greater reinvestment that could keep EBITDA margins under pressure.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.