Biomea Fusion

BMEA · NASDAQ

$0.7356−$0.0999 (−11.96%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $0.8355

BMEA analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 5 analysts over the last 12 months. 100% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy5
  • Hold0
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 8 analysts

Average $6.63 (+801.3% upside)

Low
$4.04
Now
$0.7356
High
$9.45

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

BMEA analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
CitizensOct 14, 2026MaintainsMarket Outperform
HC Wainwright & Co.Oct 14, 2026MaintainsBuy
Brookline CapitalOct 7, 2026InitiatesBuy
CitizensMay 5, 2026InitiatesMarket Outperform
D. Boral CapitalApr 28, 2026MaintainsBuy
D. Boral CapitalApr 8, 2026MaintainsBuy
CitigroupMar 27, 2026MaintainsBuy
D. Boral CapitalMar 25, 2026MaintainsBuy
D. Boral CapitalJan 13, 2026MaintainsBuy
CitigroupNov 10, 2025MaintainsBuy

The case for and against

Updated Oct 21, 2026

Bull case

Biomea Fusion is viewed positively because its lead asset icovamenib has shown a differentiated, disease-modifying profile: in COVALENT-111, a 12-week course produced a 1.5% placebo-adjusted A1c reduction in insulin-deficient diabetes and a 1% reduction in GLP-failure patients, with C-peptide gains sustained through 52 weeks and roughly 25% probability of success cited ahead of 4Q26 readouts. The pipeline also broadens the thesis, as BMF-650 delivered early Phase 1 weight loss of 1.5% to 3.2% at day 29 versus 0.1% on placebo, with approximately 79,000 hour-nanograms per milliliter exposure and a peak-to-trough ratio near 1.7 supporting once-daily dosing and clinically relevant exposure. Importantly, both programs address large unmet needs in diabetes and obesity while showing encouraging tolerability and a potential strategic-partnering path, which supports meaningful upside from a small-cap, cash-trading valuation base.

Bear case

Biomea Fusion is viewed pessimistically because its valuation depends almost entirely on icovamenib, while the company remains clinical-stage, unprofitable, and likely to need additional capital that could dilute shareholders. The core bear case is that early A1c improvements may not hold up in larger randomized trials, especially since the signal has come from small subgroups and post-hoc analyses, and longer-term efficacy and safety for both icovamenib and BMF-650 remain unproven. Even with roughly $56M in cash, the company faces intense diabetes and obesity competition, and a failure to show durable differentiation or to translate preclinical obesity data into humans could leave the stock trading at a discount to cash.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.