Brinker International

EAT · NYSE

$195.34−$2.55 (−1.29%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $197.89

EAT analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 24 analysts over the last 12 months. 83% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy1
  • Buy19
  • Hold4
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 23 analysts

Average $270.95 (+38.7% upside)

Low
$143.75
Now
$195.34
High
$341.25

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

EAT analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
CitigroupOct 19, 2026MaintainsBuy
Raymond JamesOct 16, 2026UpgradeOutperform → Strong Buy
TD CowenOct 16, 2026MaintainsBuy
JefferiesOct 14, 2026UpgradeHold → Buy
Northcoast ResearchSep 22, 2026UpgradeNeutral → Buy
DA DavidsonSep 21, 2026MaintainsNeutral
Freedom Capital MarketsSep 18, 2026MaintainsBuy
TD CowenSep 18, 2026MaintainsBuy
Stephens & Co.Sep 18, 2026MaintainsOverweight
Seaport GlobalSep 16, 2026InitiatesBuy

The case for and against

Updated Oct 14, 2026

Bull case

Brinker International is positioned for durable growth because Chili’s has rebuilt brand relevance through effective marketing, value messaging, and menu innovation, attracting about 40 million more annual customer visits over the past two years to 239 million in FY26 while average weekly guests still remain below the historical peak. Management also sees a long runway for operating leverage, with average AUVs near $5 million, roughly 20% of restaurants above $6 million generating margins about 400 bps higher than the system average, and guidance for 20-40 bps of annual restaurant-level margin expansion. In addition, the company is restarting meaningful unit growth toward 30 annual openings by FY29 across more than 300 identified U.S. trade areas, with new units expected to produce >18% restaurant-level margins and 18-20% cash-on-cash returns.

Bear case

Brinker International is facing a negative outlook because its performance is highly exposed to economic weakness, consumer trade-down behavior, and a fiercely promotional restaurant market where competition for sites, staff, and share remains intense. Chili’s is comping against extraordinary FY25 growth, so any move into negative comps could quickly raise doubts that demand was simply pulled forward, while higher food investment, labor, advertising, remodels, and tariffs may prevent margin gains from flowing through cleanly. The company also carries rising execution risk from simultaneous volume growth, menu innovation, reimages, and future unit growth, and Maggiano’s remains a drag with negative comps and weak traffic.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.