Science Applications International

SAIC · NASDAQ

$135.10+$1.97 (+1.48%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $133.13

SAIC analyst rating

HoldConsensus of 7 analysts over the last 12 months. 29% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy2
  • Hold4
  • Underperform0
  • Sell1

12-month price target · 12 analysts

Average $135.76 (+0.5% upside)

Low
$104.03
Now
$135.10
High
$161.70

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

SAIC analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
Goldman SachsSep 8, 2026MaintainsSell
JefferiesSep 1, 2026MaintainsHold
StifelSep 1, 2026MaintainsBuy
Truist SecuritiesSep 1, 2026MaintainsHold
UBSSep 1, 2026MaintainsNeutral
JefferiesAug 19, 2026MaintainsHold
TD CowenJul 7, 2026MaintainsHold
Goldman SachsJun 12, 2026MaintainsSell
UBSJun 3, 2026MaintainsNeutral
Truist SecuritiesJun 2, 2026MaintainsHold

The case for and against

Updated Oct 14, 2026

Bull case

Science Applications Intl is benefiting from a tangible operating inflection, with FQ2 revenue of $1.88 billion, 5% organic growth, and the strongest organic growth in 6 quarters, while adjusted EPS of $2.38 and $131 million of free cash flow underscored better-than-expected execution. Its Defense and Intelligence and Civilian segments both grew, margins held up despite higher SG&A, and management’s raised FY27 revenue, EBITDA, and EPS guidance plus the $150 million Project ORBIT savings plan support a credible multi-year margin expansion path toward ~11% by FY30. The outlook is further strengthened by normalized on-contract growth, a still-strong RPO coverage profile, and improving procurement conditions, which together suggest that award delays are becoming less of a structural issue and more of a timing headwind.

Bear case

Science Applications Intl is facing a weaker fundamental setup because its next-twelve-month remaining performance obligations were only flat year over year at $4.8 billion and slipped sequentially, suggesting less near-term momentum even after a large recompete. Although FY27 coverage still looks strong, the company is relying on roughly 5 points more contingency in its revenue outlook, which implies management sees elevated execution risk and is protecting against a miss. Its dependence on U.S. government demand, combined with exposure to budget disruptions, contract delays, compliance penalties, and intensifying pricing pressure, leaves revenues, cash flow, and margins vulnerable.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.