Madison Air Solutions

MAIR · NYSE

$23.19+$0.01 (+0.04%)TodayMarket closed ·
Prev close $23.18

MAIR analyst rating

BuyConsensus of 12 analysts over the last 12 months. 75% rate it a buy.
  • Strong buy0
  • Buy9
  • Hold3
  • Underperform0
  • Sell0

12-month price target · 11 analysts

Average $40.80 (+75.9% upside)

Low
$30.30
Now
$23.19
High
$51.45

Upgrades and downgrades

The latest rating actions, newest first

MAIR analyst upgrades, downgrades and rating actions
FirmDateActionRating
RBC CapitalOct 14, 2026MaintainsOutperform
CitigroupOct 12, 2026MaintainsBuy
Wells FargoAug 3, 2026MaintainsOverweight
RBC CapitalJul 31, 2026MaintainsOutperform
StifelJul 31, 2026MaintainsBuy
RBC CapitalJul 16, 2026MaintainsOutperform
Wells FargoJul 10, 2026MaintainsOverweight
StifelMay 14, 2026MaintainsBuy
JefferiesMay 13, 2026InitiatesHold
RBC CapitalMay 13, 2026MaintainsOutperform

The case for and against

Updated Oct 16, 2026

Bull case

Madison Air Solutions is well positioned because its 1Q26 revenue and EBITDA beat expectations, pro forma orders rose 29% year over year, and backlog climbed to a record $2.5 billion, supporting near-term visibility with a 1.4x book-to-bill. Its Commercial segment is the main growth engine, benefiting from strong demand in data centers, logistics, healthcare, and other institutional end markets, while the company’s custom, value-based “Return on Air” model helps sustain premium pricing and margin expansion. Residential remains resilient despite a softer macro backdrop because Madison Air avoids commoditized central A/C, focuses on healthy-air solutions with large whitespace, and is also improving financial flexibility as net leverage falls toward less than 2.5x within twelve months.

Bear case

Madison Air Solutions is weighed down by a highly cyclical revenue base that is concentrated in HVAC and IAQ end markets, with 34% of sales tied to residential demand that is already under pressure from elevated mortgage rates, housing affordability stress, and weak new construction. Competitive intensity, commodity inflation in steel, copper, and aluminum, and tariff exposure from manufacturing in Canada, Mexico, and China add further margin risk, while 2025 tariff costs were about $51 million, or 2.5% of COGS. The company also entered the market with leverage of 3.2x net debt/EBITDA, above the ~1.1x sector average, limiting flexibility and increasing financial risk if slower economic growth or softer replacement volumes persist.

Information on this page is provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes and is provided without warranty. Analyst ratings, price targets and company data come from third-party sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.